Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> Good point, but it's still a question. In fact adding debconf support
> raises the interesting question - what severity should the question be -
> critical?
>
> The package I'm maintaining (tpctl) adds /dev/thinkpad (root.root
> 0660) and so "low" would seem more appropri
>
> Good point, but it's still a question. In fact adding debconf support
> raises the interesting question - what severity should the question be -
> critical?
>
> The package I'm maintaining (tpctl) adds /dev/thinkpad (root.root
> 0660) and so "low" would seem more appropriate - in fact not as
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 11:40:10 -0700 (+), Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 18-Jul-2000 Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> > Debian policy says:
> > 4.6. Device files
> > -
> > No package may include device files in the package file tree.
> >
> > If a package needs any special device
On 18-Jul-2000 Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> Debian policy says:
> 4.6. Device files
> -
> No package may include device files in the package file tree.
>
> If a package needs any special device files that are not included in the
> base system, it has to call `makedev' in the `postinst
Debian policy says:
4.6. Device files
-
No package may include device files in the package file tree.
If a package needs any special device files that are not included in the
base system, it has to call `makedev' in the `postinst' script, after asking
the user for permission to do
5 matches
Mail list logo
