Quoting Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:53:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Seconded, this seems a good solution.
>
> Normally I would second this, however I'm going to hold out because
> wichert has a more complete solution he's planning to toss out sonn
Quoting Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> > So I want to make a Suggestion:
>
> Do you mean a Proposal? Sorry to nit-pick, but I need to know if I'm
> supposed to track this like I do other formal Proposals to change policy.
May be a draft for a proposal? ;) Sorry to be co
Fabien Ninoles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I want to make a Suggestion:
>
> Creation of a sub-directory aside from main, contrib, non-free named
> data.
I can't find anything on the official way make proposals to the
policy. Is it wrong that official proposals should be bugs against
debian
On 27-May-99 Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:53:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Seconded, this seems a good solution.
>
> Normally I would second this, however I'm going to hold out because
> wichert has a more complete solution he's planning to toss out sonn as
> the vo
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:53:03PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Seconded, this seems a good solution.
Normally I would second this, however I'm going to hold out because
wichert has a more complete solution he's planning to toss out sonn as
the vote for the logos have been tallied.
--
Joseph
Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> So I want to make a Suggestion:
Do you mean a Proposal? Sorry to nit-pick, but I need to know if I'm
supposed to track this like I do other formal Proposals to change policy.
> - Foo-Scripts;
What's a foo-script?
--
see shy jo
On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 05:37:15PM -0400, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> The reason for a seperate directory is for ease of mirroring and CD
> building. It gives us also an easy way to check if a package can be
> on data.
>
> I will really like to see this one at least second. It's an old thread
> that I
Seconded, this seems a good solution.
Quoting Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:35:57AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> > I changed the description so it does not say it is a mirror anymore:
> >
> > [..]
> >
> > Does that help at all?
>
> Not really, but if enough people really think I'm wrong on this I wo
9 matches
Mail list logo
