On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 10:42:09AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2000 at 01:10:52AM -0400 , Branden Robinson wrote:
> > At any rate, this thread is moronic.
> >
> > 1) DFSG-free packages that depend only on packages in main should go in
> > main.
> >
> > 2) DFSG-free packages that de
You're mostly right, but there still needs to be notification: it just has
to be concurrent, not previous like I thought. There is explicit
exemption of small keys, but those keys have been exempted all the
time. The big issue is that it's easier to get the review--submit and
go. Publically avai
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 07:46:11PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> Has anyone submitted the non-US tree to Treasury so that it can be
> reviewed and exported legally?
There is little point in doing this at the moment; the current regulations
are provisional and up for review soon (next month, I believe)
On Sat, May 20, 2000 at 07:46:11PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> Has anyone submitted the non-US tree to Treasury so that it can be
> reviewed and exported legally? Unless somebody's done that, the
> current export control laws still prevent export of it...They've been
> LOOSENED, not eliminated.
Um..
Has anyone submitted the non-US tree to Treasury so that it can be
reviewed and exported legally? Unless somebody's done that, the current
export control laws still prevent export of it...They've been LOOSENED,
not eliminated.
On Sat, 20 May 2000, Raul Miller wrote:
> > > Ok, nothing illegal ab
> > Ok, nothing illegal about that.
...
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 12:20:38PM -0400, Daniel Martin wrote:
> A common misconception.
>
> Under the old (1999 and earlier) encryption export controls, _all_
> encryption had to apply for an export license - even the stupid "xor
> with some fixed byte" me
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the hook supports, say, an 8 bit key, that means it's not a restricted
> piece of munitions, right? But if a hook supports, say, a 448 bit key,
> that means it's a restricted piece of munitions, right? But what about
> a hook that doesn't care about k
On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 03:22:19AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Are you sure about that? I remember something about programs providing
> the necessary hooks to insert encryption software to be restricted
> too.
I, too, have heard about this. But I think it is something that people
have said, rat
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > The program is not encumbered by encryption laws, so it doesn't need to go
> > into non-US.
Are you sure about that? I remember something about programs providing the
necessary hooks to insert encryption software to be restricted too.
Simon
--
P
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 09:29:39PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > But putting it in non-US/main would be equally legal: it only depends
> > on packages in main and non-US/main. Policy dates back to a time when
> > non-US was not split, and I would like to argue that putting it in
> > non-US/main ma
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 09:29:39PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> It's so sad to see something so simple turning into a policy debate.
At least the argument is over what to do and not who should be allowed to
do it like most Debian arguments are these days.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 12:55:53AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 06:05:08PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > I was under the impression that the partitioning between debian/main
> > > and non-US/main was only due to the archive's location in the US.
> >
> > Excellent observa
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 06:05:08PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I was under the impression that the partitioning between debian/main
> > and non-US/main was only due to the archive's location in the US.
>
> Excellent observation of the obvious. And since nothing in main can depend
> on anything o
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 02:35:21PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 08:23:48PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On 17 May 2000, Christian Marillat wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've packaged seahorse a GPL front-end for gnupg.
> > >
> > > Source: seahorse
> > > Section: contri
14 matches
Mail list logo
