On 23 Feb 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Marcelo> stuff like that. I modified it to use /etc/GNUstep/Defaults
> Marcelo> (sue me, I didn't ask here first -- now I realize I should
> Marcelo> have)
>
> Huh? There is an misunderstanding here. /etc/GNUstep/Defaults
> is great -- it is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregor Hoffleit) wrote on 21.02.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > > distributions. Frankly speaking, this looks a bit like the
> `C:\WINDOWS'
> > > approach: just add a new directory
Hi,
>>"Marcelo" == Marcelo E Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcelo> wmaker's author likes GNUstep. He made wmaker
Marcelo> GNUstep-happy. He wants to install things in
Marcelo> /usr/GNUstep/Defaults or /usr/share/GNUstep/Defaults, and
Marcelo> stuff like that. I modified it to use /etc/GNU
On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> I had packaged a previous snapshot, but ran into similar problems. I
> came up with the issues on debian-policy, but got no responses. I second
> your observations: GNUstep is not compatible with FHS/FSSTND and it has
> good reasons to do so. Making it
Hi,
>>"Marcus" == Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Marcus> And this rises the question if X *has* to reside under
Marcus> /usr/X11R6... (/usr/X11R6 ha bin, include,lib and man. Nothing
Marcus> that couldn't be put elsewhere, one would think. Please don't
Marcus> flame me if I am comple
On Sat, Feb 21, 1998 at 06:00:19PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Vincent" == Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Vincent> I remember this discussion. The main difference is that KDE
> Vincent> is not a standard (not yet at least ;) while OPENSTEP has
> Vincent> been norma
Hi,
>>"Vincent" == Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vincent> I remember this discussion. The main difference is that KDE
Vincent> is not a standard (not yet at least ;) while OPENSTEP has
Vincent> been normalized in 1994. GNUstep inteding to be OPENSTEP
Vincent> compliant I guess we a
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> > So why are all these `desktop environments' designed so that they
> > _need_ to have everything in a single directory hierarchy? This looks
> > to me as they see themselves as `pure add-ons' to other op
On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Christian Schwarz wrote:
> Note, that we had a similar discussion with the KDE packages before. KDE
> wanted to install into /opt. After the discussion, the KDE packages have
> been changed by the Debian maintainer (this was surely a lot of work) but
> I think it was worth it
On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
[snip]
> I had packaged a previous snapshot, but ran into similar problems. I
> came up with the issues on debian-policy, but got no responses. I second
> your observations: GNUstep is not compatible with FHS/FSSTND and it has
> good reasons to do so. Ma
You wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently packaging the GNUstep developement environment
(primarily for my own use by now, but I may release it in
experimental if some people are interested. However, the email I
sent to the person listed as working on it in the WNPP bounced, so
I
Hello,
I'm currently packaging the GNUstep developement environment (primarily
for my own use by now, but I may release it in experimental if some people
are interested. However, the email I sent to the person listed as working
on it in the WNPP bounced, so I may end up actually maintaini
12 matches
Mail list logo
