On Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 03:55:24AM -0500, Zed Pobre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> >Please try to convince the x?splay maintainer to split the package
> >and/or (no or, only and) the x?splay author to use a free widget set.
>
> Wh
Zed Pobre wrote:
> >Please try to convince the x?splay maintainer to split the package
> >and/or (no or, only and) the x?splay author to use a free widget set.
>
> What widget set is usually recommended as a replacement?
Any free one. Gtk comes to my mind.
Regards,
Joey
--
The
On 07-Jul-98 Martin Schulze wrote:
> Until this is done every package that depends on splay has to go into
> contrib, too. I'm sorry.
>
>> Anyone see why eMusic couldn't go into main, as it does NOT rely on qt1?
>
> It relies on a package not in main but in contrib. *bummer*.
>
No, it doesn't
Brian Almeida wrote:
> Ok, looks like eMusic *can* go into main...as it uses splay (which is in
> contrib)
Nope. It has to go into contrib then.
> Except from README.Debian out of the splay package...
> "Currently the dependency upon qt1 for the xsplay interface forces this
> package into cont
Ok, looks like eMusic *can* go into main...as it uses splay (which is in
contrib)
Except from README.Debian out of the splay package...
"Currently the dependency upon qt1 for the xsplay interface forces this
package into contrib. However, splay itself doesn't require this. At
some point in the
5 matches
Mail list logo