Re: FYI: "Wording:" changelog convention

2017-08-01 Thread Sean Whitton
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:18:24AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > I usually try to credit the person who wrote the bulk of the wording, even > if someone else asked for seconds. I think of it as more of a credit > thing than a process thing. Since Bill agrees, I've reverted my change. > Hope the s

Re: FYI: "Wording:" changelog convention

2017-08-01 Thread Bill Allombert
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 12:09:00PM -0400, Sean Whitton wrote: > Hello, > > README.md says that "Wording:" is for the author of a change. However, > I believe that the intention of the field is not to give credit to the > author of a patch, but to indicate who sought seconds for the patch. So > I

Re: FYI: "Wording:" changelog convention

2017-08-01 Thread Russ Allbery
Sean Whitton writes: > README.md says that "Wording:" is for the author of a change. However, > I believe that the intention of the field is not to give credit to the > author of a patch, but to indicate who sought seconds for the patch. So > I've replaced "author" with "proposer" in README.md.

FYI: "Wording:" changelog convention

2017-08-01 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, README.md says that "Wording:" is for the author of a change. However, I believe that the intention of the field is not to give credit to the author of a patch, but to indicate who sought seconds for the patch. So I've replaced "author" with "proposer" in README.md. Please let me know if