Bug#37345: Wording in policy for FSSTND -> FHS change

1999-05-31 Thread Julian Gilbey
> On Sun, 30 May 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > > I checked through the current version of policy, and FSSTND is > > mentioned in several places. They all appear to be trivially > > replaceable by the corresponding references to the FHS. [...] > > Maybe this is not as easy as it seems at first.

Bug#37345: Wording in policy for FSSTND -> FHS change

1999-05-31 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, 30 May 1999, Julian Gilbey wrote: > I checked through the current version of policy, and FSSTND is > mentioned in several places. They all appear to be trivially > replaceable by the corresponding references to the FHS. [...] Maybe this is not as easy as it seems at first. For example, w

Bug#37345: Wording in policy for FSSTND -> FHS change

1999-05-30 Thread Julian Gilbey
I checked through the current version of policy, and FSSTND is mentioned in several places. They all appear to be trivially replaceable by the corresponding references to the FHS. For ease, it would make sense not to refer to specific sections of the FHS where it is possible to avoid this; this w

FSSTND/FHS

1998-04-25 Thread Bob Hilliard
I have a general and a specific question. First, the general question - The Policy Manual 2.4.1.0 contains the same requirements regarding the FSSTND as previous versions: "The location of all installed files and directories must comply fully with the Linux Filesystem Structure (FSSTND).