Re: FHS and filesystem mount points (!)

1997-12-04 Thread Brian White
: > There are, as I see it, 3 general file-storage locations other than the : > standard / and /usr systems. : > : > - files local to this machine (not network mounted) : > - arch-dep files on this network : > - arch-indep files on this network : > : > The FSSTND only had /usr/local and /usr/s

Re: FHS and filesystem mount points (!)

1997-11-29 Thread Christoph Lameter
There are soo many discussions going on. Show us why this is important. Maybe one or the other attack against established concepts to get peoples brains thinking? If nothing helps: Write something that will catch Bruce's attention. Come up with another conspiracy theory f.e. and he will respond.

Re: FHS and filesystem mount points (!)

1997-11-28 Thread Brian White
What do I have to do to get some discussion about this? > Does the FHS address both local and mounted directories? To explain... > > There are, as I see it, 3 general file-storage locations other than the > standard / and /usr systems. > > - files local to this machine (not network mounted) >

FHS and filesystem mount points (!)

1997-11-17 Thread Brian White
Does the FHS address both local and mounted directories? To explain... There are, as I see it, 3 general file-storage locations other than the standard / and /usr systems. - files local to this machine (not network mounted) - arch-dep files on this network - arch-indep files on this network