> make it an amendment. Trying to figure out if we have a consensus is the
> only hard part of posting these summaries - if someone thinks we have a
> consensus I encourage them to post that to the list so we don't have to rely
> on me to sense them.
OK, I know for next time!
Julian
=-=-=-=-=
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I guess that this last comment is the reason that this proposal has
> been marked as stalled.
Nah, I just mark things stalled if there's no discussion for a week and we
don't seem to have a consensus. It doesn't really mean anything. Don't read
too much into the policy weekl
On Sun, May 30, 1999 at 02:23:44AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I guess that this last comment is the reason that this proposal has
> been marked as stalled. I would suggest that we plan to adopt the FHS
> anyway, pating attention to the changes which will appear in FHS 2.1,
> as available in the
> Adopt the FHS in place of FSSTND (#37345)
> * Stalled.
> * Proposed on 09 May 99 by Julian Gilbey; seconded by Joseph Carter,
> Aaron Van Couwenberg and Marco d'Itri.
> * Modify policy to require use of the FHS, with possible exceptions.
> ( A new version of the FHS is out, that doe
4 matches
Mail list logo
