Re: Different versions of libc6-doc

1998-04-02 Thread Joel Klecker
At 02:30 -0800 1998-04-02, Guy Maor wrote: >Juan Cespedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Would it be possible for `dinstall' to have an `arch: all' >> package and some arch-specific packages with the same name? > >No, it can't handle that. I guess you call it it libc6-doc-sparc ? Maybe lib

Re: Different versions of libc6-doc

1998-04-02 Thread Guy Maor
Juan Cespedes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would it be possible for `dinstall' to have an `arch: all' > package and some arch-specific packages with the same name? No, it can't handle that. I guess you call it it libc6-doc-sparc ? Guy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Different versions of libc6-doc

1998-04-02 Thread Juan Cespedes
Hi. As some of you may know, I'm maintaining a pre2.1 version of glibc, different than the one used in i386, m68k and alpha; we need it in sparc and powerpc. Its current version is 2.0.92, and it produces the same binary packages as glibc2.0, but with different (more modern) versi