Antonio Terceiro writes:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 05:50:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I think Debian Policy 4.0.0.0 is ready for release.
> One thing I was always curious about: is there a reason to use such a
> deep versioning scheme?
> A shorter version number
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:44:16PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:17:21AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro a écrit :
> >
> > One thing I was always curious about: is there a reason to use such a
> > deep versioning scheme?
> >
> > A shorter version number would make package main
Le Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:17:21AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro a écrit :
>
> One thing I was always curious about: is there a reason to use such a
> deep versioning scheme?
>
> A shorter version number would make package maintainers life a bit
> easier when keeping Standards-Version: up to date. For
On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 05:50:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I think Debian Policy 4.0.0.0 is ready for release.
One thing I was always curious about: is there a reason to use such a
deep versioning scheme?
A shorter version number would make package maintainers l
Le Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 05:50:13PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> This is a huge change, including the conversion to DocBook
Many thanks to you, Guillem, Osamu and everybody else how made this happen !
--
Charles
Hi folks,
I think Debian Policy 4.0.0.0 is ready for release. Here's my proposed
plan. Since this is a little bit of an unusual approach, partly because
we're in the middle of a release freeze, I wanted to give people a chance
to object first.
This is a huge change, including the con
CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-policy
Module name:debian-policy
Changes by: srivastaFri Mar 17 15:19:15 PST 2000
Modified files:
. : debian-policy.desc packaging-manual.desc
Log message:
Forgot to change the sectioncvs -q export -d debian-policy-4.0.0.0 -r
7 matches
Mail list logo
