Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-27 Thread Steve Greenland
On 24-Jan-99, 18:24 (CST), "M.C. Vernon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote: > > (What is the difference between debian-qa and debian-testing?) > > Testing is finding bugs. QA is fixing them. I'd be interested in this too. While that is rather amusing description,

Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-25 Thread Vincent Renardias
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, M.C. Vernon wrote: > > I think I'd be interested in being part of a QA team for potato. > > > > (What is the difference between debian-qa and debian-testing?) > > Testing is finding bugs. QA is fixing them. I'd be interested in this too. If you're interested, please subscr

Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-25 Thread Aaron Van Couwenberghe
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 08:59:19PM +0100, Vincent Renardias wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > > Le Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:29:38PM -0800, Aaron Van Couwenberghe écrivait: > > > If there were a group that, during freeze, were given the task of > > > handling difficult lo

Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-25 Thread M.C. Vernon
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote: > > > > I attempted to start a similar thing ~2 yrs ago (the 'Debian QA Group') but > > it mostly failed due to the little time I could spend on it back then and > > lack of interest of most of the other develo

Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-24 Thread Vincent Renardias
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Jules Bean wrote: > I think I'd be interested in being part of a QA team for potato. > > (What is the difference between debian-qa and debian-testing?) Testing mostly consists in finding exiting new bugs, while QA consists in fixing old boring bugs... ;) Cordialeme

Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-24 Thread Jules Bean
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Vincent Renardias wrote: > > I attempted to start a similar thing ~2 yrs ago (the 'Debian QA Group') but > it mostly failed due to the little time I could spend on it back then and > lack of interest of most of the other developpers. Maybe it's time to try > to restart it? > (

Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-24 Thread Hartmut Koptein
> (But my feeling on this is that 99% of the developpers prefer to spend > time on their own packages than having to deal with the bugs of other > developpers' packages.) And the rest 58% are done by us porters! :-) Thanks, Hartmut

Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-24 Thread Vincent Renardias
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:29:38PM -0800, Aaron Van Couwenberghe écrivait: > > If there were a group that, during freeze, were given the task of > > handling difficult looking bugs before they became stale, debian could > > possibly begin getting

Re: Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-24 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sat, Jan 23, 1999 at 04:29:38PM -0800, Aaron Van Couwenberghe écrivait: > If there were a group that, during freeze, were given the task of > handling difficult looking bugs before they became stale, debian could > possibly begin getting its releases out on time. > > I'm just curiou

Debian 'freeze' task force

1999-01-24 Thread Aaron Van Couwenberghe
Debian, being a volunteer organization, inherently suffers from late releases periodically. This is usually because a small group of packages have upstream bugs that the designated maintainers perhaps do not have time to cope with. If there were a group that, during freeze, were given the t