Re: Confusion about Libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages

Hi, I'm finally back into the swing of things and am back on this list. Sorry for the delay. On 1 Jul, Andrew Pimlott wrote: > I'm not qualified to recommend anything unfortunately. From my limited > understanding, including the .la files in the -dev package makes sense if > only for depend

Re: Confusion about Libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages

On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 04:00:45PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/37/37338.html > > I am currently working on editing in the policy amendments, > and I find this amendment quite confusing. Could the rpincipals > involved in this clarify exact

Re: Confusion about Libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages

Hi Manoj, > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/37/37338.html > > I am currently working on editing in the policy amendments, > and I find this amendment quite confusing. Could the rpincipals > involved in this clarify exactly where the .la files are supposed to > go? Are they

Confusion about Libtool archive (*.la) files in -dev' packages

Hi, http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/37/37338.html I am currently working on editing in the policy amendments, and I find this amendment quite confusing. Could the rpincipals involved in this clarify exactly where the .la files are supposed to go? Are they meant for the -dev packag