Le Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 02:13:56PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman écrivait:
> Sorry to say this, but this is complete and utter nonsense. The only
> difference was if you used a virtual database that can consist of
> multiple sources or a single database. How you access that database
> is the same for bot
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Read Ian's argument. This design make it difficult to say : "Now I
> want to remove all mail-transport-agent/* keys".
Sorry to say this, but this is complete and utter nonsense. The only
difference was if you used a virtual database that can consist of
multiple
Le Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 02:18:56AM +0100, Wichert Akkerman écrivait:
> Why? This is a lot less flexible imho. And it does not reduce the
> complexity (read my design again).
Read Ian's argument. This design make it difficult to say : "Now I
want to remove all mail-transport-agent/* keys".
And the
Previously Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I agree with Ian that each machine should have only one database,
> possibly none too (think about a remote db).
Why? This is a lot less flexible imho. And it does not reduce the
complexity (read my design again).
> The DB access should be done through a progra
Hello,
i've read many mails in the archive in order to make me an opinion
about the configuration management system discussed here.
The orientation is good I think. But the proposed implementation
is IMHO too much complicated. Here's a list of my thoughts on
various points of the problem.
1. Dat
5 matches
Mail list logo
