On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 02:27:43PM +, Dave Swegen did utter:
> Hi! Over the past few months I've been trying out a number of CD
> players, and have been slightly annoyed by the fact that different
> players deal with local cddb databases in different ways, resulting in a
> number of (sometimes
On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 08:49:34PM +, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 16:18:47 +0100 (+), Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Previously Dave Swegen wrote:
> > > What I would like to see is a policy covering how cddb-capable programs
> > > should behave. Perhaps this is outside the
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 16:18:47 +0100 (+), Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Dave Swegen wrote:
> > What I would like to see is a policy covering how cddb-capable programs
> > should behave. Perhaps this is outside the scope of Debian, but if it
> > isn't, and there seems to be some interes
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:18:47PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Dave Swegen wrote:
> > What I would like to see is a policy covering how cddb-capable programs
> > should behave. Perhaps this is outside the scope of Debian, but if it
> > isn't, and there seems to be some interest I wo
Previously Dave Swegen wrote:
> What I would like to see is a policy covering how cddb-capable programs
> should behave. Perhaps this is outside the scope of Debian, but if it
> isn't, and there seems to be some interest I would be happy to put
> together some sort of proposal. I guess that it woul
Hi! Over the past few months I've been trying out a number of CD
players, and have been slightly annoyed by the fact that different
players deal with local cddb databases in different ways, resulting in a
number of (sometimes incompatible) db storage schemes, and shedloads of
dot-directories. Often
6 matches
Mail list logo
