Hi!
On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 19:36:36 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Felix Lechner writes:
> > The installable stanzas in d/control (called "binary package paragraphs"
> > in policy) inherit the Section field from the source paragraph. There is
> > no reason to provide inheritance the other way around
Felix Lechner writes:
> The installable stanzas in d/control (called "binary package paragraphs"
> in policy) inherit the Section field from the source paragraph. There is
> no reason to provide inheritance the other way around.
Huh, this pointed out to me that I don't know what the current beha
Hi David,
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 7:14 AM David Bremner wrote:
>
> do you have some numbers
According to Lintian [1] all sources among the 33,721 sources in
unstable and experimental—except perhaps the ones listed below—have a
Section field in the source stanza of d/control. [2]
You can see for
Hi David,
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 7:14 AM David Bremner wrote:
>
> I think Debian would be better off if
> we eliminated sections
Without sections my request would go away, but that's as much of a
side as I will take.
> do you have some numbers
Thank you for that idea! I added a Lintian classif
Felix Lechner writes:
>
> The installable stanzas in d/control (called "binary package
> paragraphs" in policy) inherit the Section field from the source
> paragraph. There is no reason to provide inheritance the other way
> around.
>
> Also, sources may not build successfully on all architecture
Package: debian-policy
Hi,
The installable stanzas in d/control (called "binary package
paragraphs" in policy) inherit the Section field from the source
paragraph. There is no reason to provide inheritance the other way
around.
Also, sources may not build successfully on all architectures. Peopl
6 matches
Mail list logo
