Bug#983304: please document "Protected" field

2021-02-22 Thread Sergio Moraes
Hi Tomas, That is indeed vague. However, `Protected` has already been documented in testing under deb-controls [0]. I hope this helps. [0] https://manpages.debian.org/testing/dpkg-dev/deb-control.5.en.html *--Sergio Moraes* *Data Management Analyst* On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:27 AM Tomas Posp

Bug#983304: please document "Protected" field

2021-02-22 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 11:30:08 +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > > Source: debian-policy > > Version: 4.5.1.0 > > Severity: wishlist > > In Julian Andres Klode's blog I've [1] glimpsed: > > > > > New features > > > [...] > >

Bug#983304: please document "Protected" field

2021-02-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Tomas Pospisek wrote: > Source: debian-policy > Version: 4.5.1.0 > Severity: wishlist > > In Julian Andres Klode's blog I've [1] glimpsed: > > > New features > > [...] > > The Protected field is now supported. It replaces the previous Important > > field

Bug#983304: please document "Protected" field

2021-02-22 Thread Tomas Pospisek
Source: debian-policy Version: 4.5.1.0 Severity: wishlist In Julian Andres Klode's blog I've [1] glimpsed: > New features > [...] > The Protected field is now supported. It replaces the previous Important > field and is like Essential, but only for installed packages (some minor > more difference