[CC'ing you, Bob, just to diagnose the problem]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 11:15:32AM -0500, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [I read the policy mailing list; while you may feel your points are so
> > important that they merit my attention in my personal inbox
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [I read the policy mailing list; while you may feel your points are so
> important that they merit my attention in my personal inbox, there is no
> need to CC me.]
The headers of this message include:
Reply-To: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 12:18:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> [you continue to CC me personally; is this some sort of sport for you?]
No, it's mutt's default behaviour. The previous message wasn't cc'ed to
you, anyway.
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:24:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On
[you continue to CC me personally; is this some sort of sport for you?]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 02:24:23PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 10:57:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > In fact, perhaps we ought to re-examine why we even have Debian Policy when
> > you can jus
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 10:57:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:29:49PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > If you're going to do the NMUs anyway, why not just work with the current
> > policy and file normal bugs against the packages, and then NMU them if
> > they're no
[I read the policy mailing list; while you may feel your points are so
important that they merit my attention in my personal inbox, there is no
need to CC me.]
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 01:29:49PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> If you're going to do the NMUs anyway, why not just work with the current
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 04:25:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 05:42:34PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> > I second this proposal, on the condition that patches are sent to the BTS
> > (or NMUs are made) so as to avoid the possibility of packages being left out
> >
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 05:42:34PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> I second this proposal, on the condition that patches are sent to the BTS
> (or NMUs are made) so as to avoid the possibility of packages being left out
> of woody due to the surge of RC bugs this proposal will generate.
This i
I second this proposal, on the condition that patches are sent to the BTS
(or NMUs are made) so as to avoid the possibility of packages being left out
of woody due to the surge of RC bugs this proposal will generate.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them
9 matches
Mail list logo
