Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try

2001-05-06 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > --- policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001 > +++ policy.sgml.x-terminal-emulator Sun Mar 25 02:17:56 2001 > @@ -5976,13 +5976,31 @@ > > > Packages that provide a terminal emulator for the X > - Window S

Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try

2001-03-31 Thread Steve Greenland
On 30-Mar-01, 17:50 (CST), Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > are there testing utilities available such that one could > check that something is in fact 'vt100 compatible' ? export TERM=vt100 vi followed by a little browsing and editing would problably be a good enough test for th

Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try

2001-03-31 Thread Brian Russo
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 09:09:26PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:50:23PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > + To be an x-terminal-emulator, a program must: > > > + > > > + Be able to emulate a DEC VT

Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try

2001-03-30 Thread Branden Robinson
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 01:50:23PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > + To be an x-terminal-emulator, a program must: > > + > > + Be able to emulate a DEC VT100 terminal, or a compatible > > + terminal. > > are there

Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try

2001-03-30 Thread Brian Russo
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > --- policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001 > +++ policy.sgml.x-terminal-emulator Sun Mar 25 02:17:56 2001 > @@ -5976,13 +5976,31 @@ > > > Packages that provide a terminal emulator for the X > - Window S

Bug#91252: PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try

2001-03-27 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.5.2.0 > Severity: wishlist > > I believe I attempted to accomplish too much with my last policy proposal > on this subject. > > Instead of worrying about character sets, UTF-8 support, and tryi

Bug#91252: [PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try

2001-03-25 Thread Branden Robinson
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.2.0 Severity: wishlist I believe I attempted to accomplish too much with my last policy proposal on this subject. Instead of worrying about character sets, UTF-8 support, and trying to come up with some algebra through which we can find "the best" terminal emul