Hi,
Am 30.12.2017 um 01:24 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 at 22:24:23 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Am 29.12.2017 um 00:06 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
>>> Using 'Files: *' when different files are under different licenses
>>> sacrifices precision, but it doesn't sacrifice accuracy.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:24:19AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 at 22:24:23 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > Am 29.12.2017 um 00:06 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> > I had to split the game into four digestible pieces (which are in total
> > 1.2 GB large). My original idea was to
On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 at 22:24:23 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 29.12.2017 um 00:06 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> > Using 'Files: *' when different files are under different licenses
> > sacrifices precision, but it doesn't sacrifice accuracy. You can say
> >
> > Files: *
> > License: GPL-2 and
Markus Koschany writes:
> Am 29.12.2017 um 23:35 schrieb Russ Allbery:
>> Policy does not require that. ftpmaster might, which is not quite the
>> same thing.
> That's a bold claim.
> "Every package must be accompanied by a verbatim copy of its copyright
> information and distribution license
Am 29.12.2017 um 23:35 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Markus Koschany writes:
>
>> Ok I can see the misunderstanding now. The above statement would be
>> incorrect for freeorion because it translates to:
>
>> You are allowed to use the files under GPL-2 and Permissive-License-1
>> and Permissive-Licens
Markus Koschany writes:
> Ok I can see the misunderstanding now. The above statement would be
> incorrect for freeorion because it translates to:
> You are allowed to use the files under GPL-2 and Permissive-License-1
> and Permissive-License-2 and ...
> But this is not true. Not all files are
Am 28.12.2017 um 23:10 schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Markus Koschany writes:
>
>> Why do we add the BSD license to common-licenses but not MIT and zlib?
>
> I'm not sure why the BSD license was included in common-licenses
> originally. My theory was that it was to include all the licenses
> mentioned
Am 29.12.2017 um 00:06 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
[...]
> Using 'Files: *' when different files are under different licenses
> sacrifices precision, but it doesn't sacrifice accuracy. You can say
>
> Files: *
> License: GPL-2 and Permissive-License-1 and Permissive-License-2 and ...
>
> Or you c
Hello Jonathan,
On Thu, Dec 28 2017, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Using 'Files: *' when different files are under different licenses
> sacrifices precision, but it doesn't sacrifice accuracy. You can say
>
> Files: * License: GPL-2 and Permissive-License-1 and
> Permissive-License-2 and ...
>
> Or
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Markus Koschany wrote:
>> freeorion: [1]
>>
>> Rather sophisticated game GPL-2 licensed but with various contributions
>> / incorporations under different licenses. So I can't just write Files:
>> * -> GPL-2. I have to list all licenses with separate paragraphs
[...]
> Loo
Markus Koschany wrote:
> freeorion: [1]
>
> Rather sophisticated game GPL-2 licensed but with various contributions
> / incorporations under different licenses. So I can't just write Files:
> * -> GPL-2. I have to list all licenses with separate paragraphs and
> there is no way to change that with
Am 28.12.2017 um 22:19 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Hi,
>
> Markus Koschany wrote:
>
>> I still have to quote license texts verbatim. The only
>> "advantage" of the old format is that I can format d/copyright more
>> freely but the same information must be present anyway. It is simply
Markus Koschany writes:
> Why do we add the BSD license to common-licenses but not MIT and zlib?
I'm not sure why the BSD license was included in common-licenses
originally. My theory was that it was to include all the licenses
mentioned by name in the DFSG. However, the version in common-lice
Hi,
Markus Koschany wrote:
> I still have to quote license texts verbatim. The only
> "advantage" of the old format is that I can format d/copyright more
> freely but the same information must be present anyway. It is simply not
> feasible to educate all upstreams in existence to wri
Am 28.12.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Jonathan Nieder:
> Markus Koschany wrote:
>> Am 28.12.2017 um 11:21 schrieb Bill Allombert:
>>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:56:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Jonathan Nieder writes:
>
> Seconded.
license-count says this makes sense:
SIL
Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 28.12.2017 um 11:21 schrieb Bill Allombert:
>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:56:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> Jonathan Nieder writes:
Seconded.
>>>
>>> license-count says this makes sense:
>>>
>>> SIL OFL 1.0 12
>>> SIL OFL 1.1 159
>>>
Am 28.12.2017 um 11:21 schrieb Bill Allombert:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:56:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder writes:
>>> Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 01:56:44PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jonathan Nieder writes:
> > Markus Koschany wrote:
>
> >> as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
> >> licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses and that package
> >> maintainers are allowed to
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Markus Koschany wrote:
>> as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
>> licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses and that package
>> maintainers are allowed to reference them.
>>
>> License: OFL-1.1
>> Source: https://opensource.org/l
Markus Koschany wrote:
> as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
> licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses and that package
> maintainers are allowed to reference them.
>
> License: OFL-1.1
> Source: https://opensource.org/licenses/OFL-1.1
> Example package
Package: debian-policy
Version: 4.1.2.0
Severity: normal
Hi,
as discussed on debian-devel [1] I would like to request that more DFSG
licenses are added to /usr/share/common-licenses and that package
maintainers are allowed to reference them.
License: OFL-1.1
Source: https://opensource.org/licens
21 matches
Mail list logo
