Bug#85982: policy ch7 grammar issues

2001-02-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 09:30:34PM +, Mark Baker wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 11:56:03AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > > -- quote > > saying that they require certain binary packages being installed > > -- end quote > > I think this should read 'having been installed'. Present, fu

Bug#85982: policy ch7 grammar issues

2001-02-14 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 11:56:03AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > -- quote > saying that they require certain binary packages being installed > -- end quote > I think this should read 'having been installed'. Present, future and past > are being blurred in that sentence. ... packages to be i

Bug#85982: policy ch7 grammar issues

2001-02-14 Thread Mark Baker
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 11:56:03AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > -- quote > saying that they require certain binary packages being installed > -- end quote > I think this should read 'having been installed'. Present, future and past > are being blurred in that sentence. How about '...that

Bug#85982: policy ch7 grammar issues

2001-02-14 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.5.0.0 Severity: minor -- quote saying that they require certain binary packages being installed -- end quote I think this should read 'having been installed'. Present, future and past are being blurred in that sentence. -- quote the fields which declare dependen