Bug#83669: dynamic creation of libx.so.n

2001-02-05 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 05:06:29PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > Herbert> wrote: > >> As such, I recommend that we change this bug title to: > >> > >> "dynamic creation of libx.so.n" > > Herbert> Sorry, but this has been solved ages ago in ldconfig :) > > Maybe so, but then Debia

Bug#83669: dynamic creation of libx.so.n

2001-02-05 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 05:06:29PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > > Maybe so, but then Debian packages shouldn't include the symlink in > the runtime library package. It doesn't need to. Just call ldconfig to make the symlink. > Also, who is responsible for deleting the symlink when it is no longer

Bug#83669: dynamic creation of libx.so.n

2001-02-05 Thread Brian May
> "Herbert" == Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Herbert> On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:13:44PM +1100, Brian May Herbert> wrote: >> As such, I recommend that we change this bug title to: >> >> "dynamic creation of libx.so.n" Herbert> Sorry, but this has been solved

Bug#83669: dynamic creation of libx.so.n

2001-02-05 Thread Herbert Xu
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:13:44PM +1100, Brian May wrote: > > As such, I recommend that we change this bug title to: > > "dynamic creation of libx.so.n" Sorry, but this has been solved ages ago in ldconfig :) -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>H

Bug#83669: dynamic creation of libx.so.n

2001-02-04 Thread Brian May
> "Brian" == Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Brian> For everyone concerned: versions of libtool already support Brian> this. eg. cvs version of libtool 1.4, and cvs tree for Brian> libtool 1.3x (not sure if includes the latest release of Brian> libtool or not, it definit