Re: Bug#835520: Policy 9.3.1 is inaccurate to the point of being harmful

2016-09-04 Thread Bill Allombert
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:16:49PM +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Steve Langasek: > > >The work of revising Debian Policy includes filing a public bug report and > >discussing the proposed changes with the Debian Developer community via > >the debian-policy mailing list. Have you done t

Bug#835520: Policy 9.3.1 is inaccurate to the point of being harmful

2016-09-04 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Steve Langasek: The work of revising Debian Policy includes filing a public bug report and discussing the proposed changes with the Debian Developer community via the debian-policy mailing list. Have you done this? Wakey wakey, M. Langasek! You know that the answer is yes, if you are not as

Re: Bug#835520: Policy 9.3.1 is inaccurate to the point of being harmful

2016-08-28 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:15:35AM +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: > Sam Hartman: > >Hi. As part of reviewing an issue for the technical committee, I just read > >policy section 9.3 in its entirety. > >Section 9.3.1 really seems to be showing its age. That section covers > >runlevels and

Re: Bug#835520: Policy 9.3.1 is inaccurate to the point of being harmful

2016-08-28 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Sam Hartman: Hi. As part of reviewing an issue for the technical committee, I just read policy section 9.3 in its entirety. Section 9.3.1 really seems to be showing its age. That section covers runlevels and the sequencing numbers after S and K in rc.d links without reference to dependency-b

Bug#835520: Policy 9.3.1 is inaccurate to the point of being harmful

2016-08-26 Thread Sam Hartman
package: debian-policy severity: normal Hi. As part of reviewing an issue for the technical committee, I just read policy section 9.3 in its entirety. Section 9.3.1 really seems to be showing its age. That section covers runlevels and the sequencing numbers after S and K in rc.d links without re