On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 08:41:33PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> I wwanted to suggest putting the thing that dh_make does into
> /etc/init.d/skeleton but then I've found out dh_make does not generate an
> initscript at all. See #832764. That bug also says the dh_make skeleton
> was problematic
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 04:30:57PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Andrey Rahmatullin.
>
> Thanks for your input. (Did you also look at the other patches in the
> series? Any objections or support for any of them?)
I did and I thought I don't have enough confidence to say anything about
t
Hello Andrey Rahmatullin.
Thanks for your input. (Did you also look at the other patches in the
series? Any objections or support for any of them?)
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 07:21:00PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > The dh_
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> The dh_make program should generate the current best practises
> version
I'm not sure about this.
And this is the first mention of dh_make in the policy except for a
footnote about writing manpages.
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:0
The dh_make program should generate the current best practises
version and for any current init system. In other word this
wording is more init agnostic (and thus hopefully future-proof).
---
policy.sgml | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.
5 matches
Mail list logo
