Bug#770440: debian-policy: policy should mention systemd timers

2017-10-22 Thread Josh Triplett
On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:30:13 +0100 Alexandre Detiste wrote: > The policy should mention how to handle systemd native timers > to avoid these kind of bugs in the future; > when other packages will start shipping native timers. > > Here is the spirit of this change: > > +To maintaint compatabilit

Bug#770440: debian-policy: policy should mention systemd timers

2017-01-01 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Hi, This is the most interresting mail I ever salavaged from my gmail spam folder. >> Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) >> I've seen that util-linux was the first package that started providing a >> native systemd timer for fstrim, but this change got reverted. There's now apt-daily.timer that is s

Bug#770440: debian-policy: policy should mention systemd timers

2016-12-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Alexandre Detiste writes: > I've seen that util-linux was the first package that started providing a > native systemd timer for fstrim, but this change got reverted. >> util-linux (2.25.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium >> * Ship fstrim timer/service units as examples only (Closes: #767194) >> - t

Bug#770440: debian-policy: policy should mention systemd timers

2014-11-21 Thread Alexandre Detiste
Package: debian-policy Severity: normal Dear Maintainers, I've seen that util-linux was the first package that started providing a native systemd timer for fstrim, but this change got reverted. > util-linux (2.25.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium > * Ship fstrim timer/service units as examples only