On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:08:25AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:08:50AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015, at 20:21, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:27:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > >
> > > > yeah, I seco
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:08:50AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015, at 20:21, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:27:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >
> > > yeah, I second this version:
> > > > + For packages in the main archive, no r
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015, at 20:21, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:27:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > yeah, I second this version:
> > > + For packages in the main archive, no required targets
> > > + may attempt network access.
> >
> > even if I would p
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:27:56PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> yeah, I second this version:
> > + For packages in the main archive, no required targets
> > + may attempt network access.
>
> even if I would prefer something that did not restrict to main, and said
> something
On 31/01/15 at 20:47 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 23/11/14 at 21:13 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Was there a lot of failure ?
> >
> > No
> >
> > > What severity did you use for the bug report ?
> >
> > serious
>
> So
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:21:27AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/11/14 at 21:13 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Was there a lot of failure ?
>
> No
>
> > What severity did you use for the bug report ?
>
> serious
So in practice, this is already handled as a RC bug. Good.
> > Are you in
[Let's leave the problem of d-i aside for the moment. I suppose it'll
require a special exception in Policy, at least for the time being.]
* Lucas Nussbaum , 2014-11-24, 10:21:
I wonder if it should be turned into "the package must not rely on
external access network to build correctly".
That
On 23/11/14 at 21:13 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:15:33PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 23/11/14 at 20:03 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:47:00PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Bill Allom
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:15:33PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 23/11/14 at 20:03 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:47:00PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > > --- a/policy.sgml
> > > > +++ b/policy.sgml
>
On 23/11/14 at 20:03 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:47:00PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > --- a/policy.sgml
> > > +++ b/policy.sgml
> > > @@ -1928,12 +1928,16 @@ zope.
> > > impossible to auto-compile th
Bill Allombert (2014-11-23):
> > This is something we want for multiple reasons, but have we already fixed
> > all instances of, e.g., validating sgml/xml parsers trying to fetch DTDs or
> > schemas during documentation build ? Or other network access attempts that
> > don't fail a build (and hel
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:47:00PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > --- a/policy.sgml
> > +++ b/policy.sgml
> > @@ -1928,12 +1928,16 @@ zope.
> > impossible to auto-compile that package and also makes it hard
> > for other people
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 10:52:54PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:24:15PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > 2.2.1 says "the packages in main
> > >
> > >must not require or recommend a package outside of main for
> > > compilation or
> > > execution (thus, the p
On Sun, 23 Nov 2014, Bill Allombert wrote:
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -1928,12 +1928,16 @@ zope.
> impossible to auto-compile that package and also makes it hard
> for other people to reproduce the same binary package, all
> required targets must be non-int
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 05:38:50PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > 2.2.1 says "the packages in main
> >
> >must not require or recommend a package outside of main for compilation
> > or
> > execution (thus, the package must not declare a
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:24:15PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > 2.2.1 says "the packages in main
> >
> >must not require or recommend a package outside of main for compilation
> > or
> > execution (thus, the package must not declare a "Pre-Depends", "Depends",
> > "Recommends", "Build-Dep
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:03:07PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> 2.2.1 says "the packages in main
>
>must not require or recommend a package outside of main for compilation or
> execution (thus, the package must not declare a "Pre-Depends",
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:24:15PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I guess that it is implicit from the defintion of contrib that follows in
> > 2.2.2:
> >
> > The contrib archive area contains supplemental packages intended to work
> > with
>
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 09:24:15PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I guess that it is implicit from the defintion of contrib that follows in
> 2.2.2:
>
> The contrib archive area contains supplemental packages intended to work
> with
> the Debian distribution, but which require software outsi
Le Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:03:07PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin a écrit :
>
> 2.2.1 says "the packages in main
>
>must not require or recommend a package outside of main for compilation or
> execution (thus, the package must not declare a "Pre-Depends", "Depends",
> "Recommends", "Build-Depends"
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
2.2.1 says "the packages in main
must not require or recommend a package outside of main for compilation or
execution (thus, the package must not declare a "Pre-Depends", "Depends",
"Recommends", "Build-Depends", or "Build-Depends-Indep" relationship o
21 matches
Mail list logo
