On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:29:12AM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > This has now been seconded twice; it should have its status changed to
> > "accepted" and I guess that the sysvinit and file-rc packages should
> > have bugs against them to include
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> This has now been seconded twice; it should have its status changed to
> "accepted" and I guess that the sysvinit and file-rc packages should
> have bugs against them to include the necessary scripts. Perhaps they
The file-rc scripts are not written yet
This has now been seconded twice; it should have its status changed to
"accepted" and I guess that the sysvinit and file-rc packages should
have bugs against them to include the necessary scripts. Perhaps they
should both Provide: invoke-rc so that packages using it can depend on
invoke-rc? Or sh
Hmm... This cold must be getting to me worse than I thought.
I've retitled the bug. This message is being sent just so that people will
actually know what was submitted at a glance ;-)
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind
4 matches
Mail list logo
