wf...@niif.hu (Ferenc Wágner) writes:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 23:33:13 -0800 Russ Allbery wrote:
>> + To support merged-/usr systems, packages must not
>> + install files in both path
> Is there a reason to omit the leading slash in this construct? I think
> I'd find /path more sy
On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 23:33:13 -0800 Russ Allbery wrote:
> + To support merged-/usr systems, packages must not
> + install files in both path
Is there a reason to omit the leading slash in this construct? I think
I'd find /path more symmetric and thus easier to
follow.
--
Regards
Ansgar Burchardt writes:
> Seconded.
> Though shouldn't this be worded a bit more generic? There are also
> /lib32 vs /usr/lib32 and /lib64 vs /usr/lib64 (and possibly other
> suffixes like libx32).
> Also I don't think Policy should require maintainer scripts for the
> implementation of compat
On Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:56:31 +0100 Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Though shouldn't this be worded a bit more generic? There are also
> /lib32 vs /usr/lib32 and /lib64 vs /usr/lib64 (and possibly other
> suffixes like libx32).
>
> Also I don't think Policy should require maintainer scripts for the
> im
On Mon, 07 Mar 2016, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Though shouldn't this be worded a bit more generic? There are also
> /lib32 vs /usr/lib32 and /lib64 vs /usr/lib64 (and possibly other
> suffixes like libx32).
>
> Also I don't think Policy should require maintainer scripts for the
> implementation of
Hello!
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:56:31PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Bill Allombert wrote:
> > So to recap, Marco proposal is
> >
> > diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> > index 404dc73..74f0a3b 100644
> > --- a/policy.sgml
> > +++ b/policy.sgml
> > @@ -8508,6 +8508,21 @@ fi
> >
Bill Allombert wrote:
> So to recap, Marco proposal is
>
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 404dc73..74f0a3b 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -8508,6 +8508,21 @@ fi
> renamed. If a consensus cannot be reached, both
> programs must be renamed.
>
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016, Bill Allombert wrote:
> So to recap, Marco proposal is
>
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 404dc73..74f0a3b 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -8508,6 +8508,21 @@ fi
> renamed. If a consensus cannot be reached, both
> programs m
On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 02:08:34AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jan 24, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>
> > > I wanted to open this discussion, but it's not clear whether we're ready
> > > yet to actually merge this patch.
> > We are now: there are less than 10 packages left which have not been
> > fix
On Jan 24, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> > I wanted to open this discussion, but it's not clear whether we're ready
> > yet to actually merge this patch.
> We are now: there are less than 10 packages left which have not been
> fixed, all of them with patches
We are down to 4 broken packages left (safe-r
On Jan 24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I couldn't find bugs for these packages:
Thank you. Hopefully now that the lintian check has been merged we
should not get many new bugs...
> * yp-tools + hostname:
I opened #812532, looks like my development/check-contents script is
buggy since it missed this on
* Marco d'Itri , 2016-01-24, 12:27:
We are now: there are less than 10 packages left which have not been
fixed, all of them with patches
I couldn't find bugs for these packages:
* yp-tools + hostname:
/bin/domainname
/bin/nisdomainname
/bin/ypdomainname
* pm-utils + molly-guard:
/sbin/pm-hibe
On Aug 27, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I wanted to open this discussion, but it's not clear whether we're ready
> yet to actually merge this patch.
We are now: there are less than 10 packages left which have not been
fixed, all of them with patches
I am attaching a revised text.
--
ciao,
Marco
diff
On Aug 27, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Disallowing such compatibility symlinks means that those programs
> can no longer be moved between directories w/o possibly breaking
> things that use absolute pathname, which should be considered a bug
> in Debian, but is something that still happens. And local
On 27/08/14 17:59, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Some other distributions have merged /bin, /sbin, and /lib into /usr
> via the symlinks:
>
> /bin -> /usr/bin
> /sbin -> /usr/sbin
> /lib -> /usr/lib
> /lib64 -> /usr/lib64
Other merges worth considering if you're in a "kill all the directo
Hi!
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 09:59:10 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I could have sworn we already had a bug open about this, but I couldn't
> find it. If someone else does find it, please merge.
I'm not sure if you were thinking about #562863? Althoug
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
I could have sworn we already had a bug open about this, but I couldn't
find it. If someone else does find it, please merge.
Some other distributions have merged /bin, /sbin, and /lib into /usr
via the symlinks:
/bin -> /usr/bin
/sbin -> /usr/sb
17 matches
Mail list logo
