Bug#759491: Bug#758234: Defining pseudo-essential

2014-08-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy writes: > Thanks Russ, I think that this new paragraph is very useful. > If need is I second its addition. Yes, I'm looking for seconds for this. Thank you! > This addition will cause the current section 3.9 (Maintainer Scripts) to > be renumbered 3.10, but I do not expect this

Bug#759491: Bug#758234: Defining pseudo-essential

2014-08-27 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:15:28PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > Jakub Wilk writes: > > * Russ Allbery , 2014-08-27, 09:22: > > >>+ often tricky and inobvious. > > > Is it "inobvious", "unobvious", or "non(-)obvious"? > > Maybe just say "not obvious". > > Yes, that's better. Thanks

Bug#759491: Bug#758234: Defining pseudo-essential

2014-08-27 Thread Russ Allbery
Jakub Wilk writes: > * Russ Allbery , 2014-08-27, 09:22: >>+ often tricky and inobvious. > Is it "inobvious", "unobvious", or "non(-)obvious"? > Maybe just say "not obvious". Yes, that's better. Thanks. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org)

Bug#759491: Bug#758234: Defining pseudo-essential

2014-08-27 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Russ Allbery , 2014-08-27, 09:22: + often tricky and inobvious. Is it "inobvious", "unobvious", or "non(-)obvious"? Maybe just say "not obvious". -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis