Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2017-08-06 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 19:10:36 -0400, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:54:15AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Except for the last dpkg which should probably be dpkg-source, I do > > like this version better. > > > > Also perhaps worth mentioning that dpkg-source will remove the va

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2017-08-01 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello Guillem, On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:54:15AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Except for the last dpkg which should probably be dpkg-source, I do > like this version better. > > Also perhaps worth mentioning that dpkg-source will remove the value > if there is no debian/tests/control file (and

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2017-08-01 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2014-08-20 at 09:44:45 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > There are cases when you want to add it explicitly, e.g. when someone > comes up with a new possible value for it that is not automatically > added yet. > > Testsuite: mynewthing > > or even > > Testsuite: autopkgtest, mynewthi

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2014-08-20 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:38:32PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:35:22PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > > > Anybody Developer who thinks that 1) the Policy is useful and 2) the > > > Testsuite > > > field is useful, can participate. What is needed is to read th

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2014-08-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:35:22PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > > Anybody Developer who thinks that 1) the Policy is useful and 2) the > > Testsuite > > field is useful, can participate. What is needed is to read the text > > below, > > verify that it reflects the facts, and if yes, se

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2014-08-19 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:34:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > Le Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:36:50PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > > > > > > > Here is a patch to update the Policy accordingly. Do you have comments > > > > ? > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:44:19AM +0900, Charles Pless

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2014-08-19 Thread Charles Plessy
> > Le Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:36:50PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > > > > > Here is a patch to update the Policy accordingly. Do you have comments ? > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:44:19AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > Anybody wanting to see the Testsuite field documented in the Poli

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2014-08-19 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Charles, On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:44:19AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:36:50PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > > Package: debian-policy > > Version: 3.9.5 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Hi Guillem and everybody, > > > > thanks for adding direct support for the

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2014-08-18 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:36:50PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Package: debian-policy > Version: 3.9.5 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi Guillem and everybody, > > thanks for adding direct support for the Testsuite field in Dpkg. > > Here is a patch to update the Policy accordingly. Do you have

Bug#758124: Documenting the Testsuite field in the Policy.

2014-08-14 Thread Charles Plessy
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.9.5 Severity: wishlist Hi Guillem and everybody, thanks for adding direct support for the Testsuite field in Dpkg. Here is a patch to update the Policy accordingly. Do you have comments ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan >From b267