Hi,
Quoting Matthias Urlichs (2014-08-07 07:54:26)
> Also, "build profiles" are not explained anywhere in Policy (unless that's
> been added after 3.9.5), so how would I discover which values are allowed /
> make sense?
right. For the purpose of documenting the Package-List its usage for build
pr
Hi,
Johannes Schauer:
> + Fifth and subsequent space-separated items are key/value pairs of
> + the form key=value1,value2. The currently used keys are
> + the arch key which lists the architectures a binary
> + package builds for and the profile key which l
Hi,
Quoting Charles Plessy (2014-08-06 07:41:40)
> what do you think about the patch I sent to the Policy, for describing the
> syntax of the current optional fields of the Packages-List field ? Do you
> think that modifications are needed ? Would you second it ?
>
> https://bugs.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 Extension of the syntax of the Packages-List field.
Le Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 07:16:37AM +0200, Johannes Schauer a écrit :
>
> The field started out with the binary package name, type, section and
> priority.
> For bootstrapping it is necessary to know for which architectures a
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Version: 3.9.5.0
Le Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 12:25:05PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
> On 08/01/2014 12:17, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Paul Wise [2014-08-01 11:33 +0200]:
> * The source package includes a Package-List field that also ha
5 matches
Mail list logo
