On Fri, 8 May 2015 14:43:45 +0200 Bill Allombert
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:36:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Altogether, the wording was not restrictive as I thought.
> >
> > Nevertheless, what would people think of adding a bit more explanation on
> > the
> > purpose of replaci
+ If your package includes the scripts config.sub and
+ config.guess, you should arrange for the versions
+ provided by the package autotools-dev be used
+ instead (see autotools-dev documentation for
+ details how to achieve that). This ensures that th
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 02:43:45PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:36:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Altogether, the wording was not restrictive as I thought.
> >
> > Nevertheless, what would people think of adding a bit more explanation on
> > the
> > purpose of
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 09:36:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Altogether, the wording was not restrictive as I thought.
>
> Nevertheless, what would people think of adding a bit more explanation on the
> purpose of replacing these files ? Not all readers will have
> /usr/share/doc/autotools-d
> >> Le Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> >> > +
> >> > + If your package includes the scripts config.sub
> >> > and
> >> > + config.guess, you should arrange for the versions
> >> > + provided by the package autotools-dev be
> >> > us
On 12 July 2014 19:50, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 09:42:23AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Le Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
>> >
>> > +
>> > + If your package includes the scripts config.sub and
>> > + config.guess,
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 09:42:23AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
> >
> > +
> > + If your package includes the scripts config.sub and
> > + config.guess, you should arrange for the versions
> > +
Le Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 04:46:53PM +0200, Bill Allombert a écrit :
>
> +
> + If your package includes the scripts config.sub and
> + config.guess, you should arrange for the versions
> + provided by the package autotools-dev be used
> + instead (see
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:36:34PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
>
> It seems that a lot of packages do not use something like
> autoreconf during build, and every time someone starts a new
> port he has to patches way too many packages to get config.guess
> and config.sub upd
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 05:02:00PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:34:05AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> > On 04/30/2014 10:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Package: debian-policy
>
> > > It seems that a lot of packages do not use something like
> > > autoreconf during bui
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 01:34:05AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 10:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Package: debian-policy
> > It seems that a lot of packages do not use something like
> > autoreconf during build, and every time someone starts a new
> > port he has to patches way too m
On 04/30/2014 10:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
>
> It seems that a lot of packages do not use something like
> autoreconf during build, and every time someone starts a new
> port he has to patches way too many packages to get config.guess
> and config.sub updated.
Do you have
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:36:34PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
>
> It seems that a lot of packages do not use something like
> autoreconf during build, and every time someone starts a new
> port he has to patches way too many packages to get config.guess
> and config.sub upd
Package: debian-policy
It seems that a lot of packages do not use something like
autoreconf during build, and every time someone starts a new
port he has to patches way too many packages to get config.guess
and config.sub updated.
I would like that we say that at least config.guess and config.sub
14 matches
Mail list logo
