I second the amended proposal.
I include a sort-of template for dh_make to help implementing it.
It may really save time to autobuilders, since more and more packages use
complex text-processing softwares to render theirs documentations, and this
often means several packages to be installed befor
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 72335 normal
Bug#72335: [PROPOSAL] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets for
debian/rules
Severity set to `normal'.
> title 72335 [AMENDMENT 23/5/2001] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets
> for debian/rules
Unkn
severity 72335 normal
title 72335 [AMENDMENT 23/5/2001] Optional build-arch and build-indep targets
for debian/rules
thanks
Once again, this proposal (in its amended form) has gained two
seconds. I propose a 10 day discussion period.
The question of how to handle the use of this is still a litt
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 10:15:36PM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20010411T191823+0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I've just found an issue which must be resolved whether this proposal
> > is accepted or not. At present, the Build-{Depends,Conflicts}-Indep
> > lists do not apply to the bu
On 20010329T112958+0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> OK, after Wichert's comments, here is a new version of the proposed
> amendment to policy.
Seconded.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
pgpHcMbbIlovJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 20010411T191823+0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I've just found an issue which must be resolved whether this proposal
> is accepted or not. At present, the Build-{Depends,Conflicts}-Indep
> lists do not apply to the build target. This is incorrect. This
> proposal already fixes this issue.
It w
I've just found an issue which must be resolved whether this proposal
is accepted or not. At present, the Build-{Depends,Conflicts}-Indep
lists do not apply to the build target. This is incorrect. This
proposal already fixes this issue.
This is still looking for seconds: Antti-Juhani and Roman,
OK, after Wichert's comments, here is a new version of the proposed
amendment to policy. Note that there is no mention of "debian/rules
-q " giving exit status of 2 if the target does not exist;
this should really be handled as part of the question of whether
debian/rules are makefiles is mandator
8 matches
Mail list logo
