Russ Allbery dixit:
>Thorsten Glaser writes:
>> If not… well, since snapshot.d.o is an official service now, I’d say,
[…]
>Hm, that's an interesting point, indeed.
>> Are those source packages (that would not otherwise be kept in the
>> archive) released along with “stable”, despite having no bi
Thorsten Glaser writes:
> There’s something else about Built-Using:
> Are those source packages (that would not otherwise be kept in the
> archive) released along with “stable”, despite having no binary
> packages?
Yes, I believe that's how the implementation works.
> If not… well, since snaps
Russ Allbery dixit:
>of the GPLv2, the GPLv2 itself requires that all of the *source* for the
>binary be distributed under the GPLv2. And the libgcc *source* is only
>available under the GPLv3, and the runtime exception doesn't allow one to
>distribute the *source* under different terms, only the
Russ Allbery dixit:
>If we do need to preserve source for the libcc and libc components
>incorporated into binary builds, that's going to mean Built-Using for
>nearly the whole archive, and a lot of complexity on the DAK side. That's
>obviously not very desirable. We would rather decide that we
4 matches
Mail list logo
