Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -patch +pending
Bug #688251 [debian-policy] Built-Using description too aggressive
Removed tag(s) patch.
Bug #688251 [debian-policy] Built-Using description too aggressive
Added tag(s) pending.
--
688251: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688
control: tag -1 -patch +pending
Hello,
On Wed, Dec 27 2017, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Is this part just a line-wrapping change? If so, feel free to check
> it in directly to make the normative diff easier to review.
No: s/required part of the complete source/part of the complete source/.
I can
Hi,
Sean Whitton wrote:
> --- a/policy/ch-relationships.rst
> +++ b/policy/ch-relationships.rst @@ -598,17 +598,26 @@ earlier for
> binary packages) in order to invoke the targets in
> Additional source packages used to build the binary - ``Built-Using``
> --
Hi,
Charles Plessy wrote:
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -5563,7 +5563,13 @@ Replaces: mail-transport-agent
>
>
>
> - A Built-Using field must list the corresponding source
> + When the licensing terms of the incorporated parts require to provide
> +
Package: debian-policy
Severity: normal
Based on discussion in debian-devel, the current Built-Using description
would imply that it had to be present for, say, the code from libgcc
incorporated into every binary build. The description should be modified
to be clear that it is only mandatory if t
5 matches
Mail list logo
