Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Wrong: -f dereferences symlinks and says whether the final destination
> is a normal file. That's what you want:
Ok, change accepted.
--
see shy jo
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:14:05AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > I (very belatedly) second this proposal.
>
> Thanks. I think I have enough seconds now, don't really remember.
>
> > There's one small change I would make though; see below.
>
> > > + if [ -e /etc/default
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> I (very belatedly) second this proposal.
Thanks. I think I have enough seconds now, don't really remember.
> There's one small change I would make though; see below.
> > + if [ -e /etc/default/bind ]; then
>
> I would change the test to [ -f /etc/default/bind ].
I (very belatedly) second this proposal. There's one small change I
would make though; see below.
On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 03:03:10AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> There has been some discussion lately on debian-deval (and a bit on
> -policy) about init
On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 03:03:10AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> see shy jo, who thinks we overuse the term "orthagonal" in Debian
Indeed. I'd prefer we used a term that was actually a word, and not some
weirdass misspelling of "orthogonal". :)
--
G. Branden Robinson | We either le
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 12:06:45PM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> Was there a suggestion to remain the directory to something other than
> /etc/defaults?
Makes sense. It's not a directory of defaults, it's a directory of
customizations. The defaults are in the init scripts. Better to change
this
Anthony Towns wrote:
> How does this relate to the files in /etc/network? /etc/network/options
> and /etc/network/spoof-protect in particular? Should these be moved to
> /etc/default/networking or something instead now?
If they're used by the init script to set variables, then, yes.
> So, seconde
On Sat, Jul 08, 2000 at 03:03:10AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> [a rationale]
I'd like to see init.d files become non-conffiles, or at least be able to
be treated as though the weren't conffiles in any realistic case, so this
sounds good to me.
> --- policy.text.orig Sat Jul 8 02:21:49 2000
> +++
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There has been some discussion lately on debian-deval (and a bit on
> -policy) about init scripts. One concern that has arisen is that it can
> be very annoying to have to modify an init script to change a simple
> value in it, and then be forced to maintain y
i also second this proposal.
craig
--
craig sanders
pgpFbV9y2ama2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 08-Jul-2000 Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> There has been some discussion lately on debian-deval (and a bit on
> -policy) about init scripts. One concern that has arisen is that it can
> be very annoying to have to modify an init script to change a simple
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: debian-policy
> Severity: wishlist
>
> There has been some discussion lately on debian-deval (and a bit on
> -policy) about init scripts. One concern that has arisen is that it can
> be very annoying t
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
There has been some discussion lately on debian-deval (and a bit on
-policy) about init scripts. One concern that has arisen is that it can
be very annoying to have to modify an init script to change a simple
value in it, and then be forced to maintain you
13 matches
Mail list logo
