Re: [Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd]

2000-08-01 Thread Arthur Korn
Hello. Arthur Korn schrieb: > Manoj Srivastava schrieb: > > Arthur> There should probably also be guidlines on syslog-facility > > Arthur> and the rotating and logging behavior of packages providing > > Arthur> syslogd, in order for other packages to know what they can > > Arthur> assume. > >

Re: [Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd]

2000-07-11 Thread Arthur Korn
Hello. Manoj Srivastava schrieb: > Arthur> There should probably also be guidlines on syslog-facility > Arthur> and the rotating and logging behavior of packages providing > Arthur> syslogd, in order for other packages to know what they can > Arthur> assume. > > Can you elucidate? The b

Re: [Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd]

2000-07-11 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Arthur> There should probably also be guidlines on syslog-facility Arthur> and the rotating and logging behavior of packages providing Arthur> syslogd, in order for other packages to know what they can Arthur> assume. Can you elucidate? The best way to determine what policy shoul

Re: [Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd]

2000-07-03 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 09:23:49PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote: > I think it would be even better to split up sysklogd into two > packages, and then have virtual packages like > 'system-log-daemen' and 'linux-kernel-log-daemon' (or would > 'kernel-log-daemon' be sufficient? Im thinking on the HURD).

[Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd]

2000-07-03 Thread Arthur Korn
Hello. This list seems to be the right place for this ... BTW: I'm on the list now. - Forwarded message from Arthur Korn - Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 16:28:59 +0200 From: Arthur Korn To: Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: sys

Re: Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd

2000-07-01 Thread Herbert Xu
Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > names: ftp-server, not ftpd, or c-compiler, not cc. I'd rather have > the virtual package be named system-log-daemon. Just a suggestion. Personally I prefer syslog-daemon. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~

Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd

2000-07-01 Thread Chris Waters
On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 05:12:01PM +0200, Arthur Korn wrote: > I'd like to have all unix logging subsystems provide syslogd, so > users are free to choose one that fits them. (I'm packaging msyslog > (http://www.core-sdi.com/) and see that this would be already the third > non-obsolete logging-dae

Bug#66535: proposal of virtual package: syslogd

2000-06-30 Thread Arthur Korn
Package: debian-policy Version: 3.1.1.1 Severity: wishlist I'd like to have all unix logging subsystems provide syslogd, so users are free to choose one that fits them. (I'm packaging msyslog (http://www.core-sdi.com/) and see that this would be already the third non-obsolete logging-daemon in deb