On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:55:02 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 23:03:59 +0100 Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> > Can we make stripping static libraries a Policy “should”?
>
> I note that Fedora is going the opposite way. They are currently
> stripping static libraries and are moving towards not st
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 23:03:59 +0100 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Can we make stripping static libraries a Policy “should”?
I note that Fedora is going the opposite way. They are currently
stripping static libraries and are moving towards not stripping:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/StaticLibraryDe
On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 19:13:15 +0100 Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2014-02-28 19:05, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > I could do some work if you point me thé branch
> >
> > Bastien
> > [...]
>
> It is the branch from [1]; needs to be rebased on top of a recent
> version of Lintian.
>
> ~Niels
>
> [1]
On 2014-02-28 19:05, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> I could do some work if you point me thé branch
>
> Bastien
> [...]
It is the branch from [1]; needs to be rebased on top of a recent
version of Lintian.
~Niels
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/nthykier/lintian.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/h
I could do some work if you point me thé branch
Bastien
Le 28 févr. 2014 18:57, "Niels Thykier" a écrit :
> On 2014-02-28 16:51, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:13:30AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have created a Lintian branch for detecting insufficient
On 2014-02-28 16:51, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:13:30AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have created a Lintian branch for detecting insufficient stripping of
>> static libs[1]. On a related note, dh_strip seems to do "the right
>> thing(tm)" so any package using
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:13:30AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have created a Lintian branch for detecting insufficient stripping of
> static libs[1]. On a related note, dh_strip seems to do "the right
> thing(tm)" so any package using debhelper (correctly) should already
> strip stat
Hi,
I have created a Lintian branch for detecting insufficient stripping of
static libs[1]. On a related note, dh_strip seems to do "the right
thing(tm)" so any package using debhelper (correctly) should already
strip static libs. Though I did not check if it can do detacted symbols...
~Niels
Russ Allbery writes:
> One drawback here, then, is that we don't know how many packages
> would be affected. Is there a way that Lintian could introduce a
> check so that we know how many packages we would make buggy by adding
> a should?
Hi,
Both objdump and readelf handles ".a" files by givin
Jakub Wilk writes:
> * Russ Allbery , 2012-03-17, 16:52:
>> Does Lintian already check for unstripped static libraries?
> No, it doesn't.
One drawback here, then, is that we don't know how many packages would be
affected. Is there a way that Lintian could introduce a check so that we
know how
* Russ Allbery , 2012-03-17, 16:52:
Does Lintian already check for unstripped static libraries?
No, it doesn't.
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://list
Jakub Wilk writes:
> As far as I can tell, the Policy currently doesn't require stripping
> static libraries[0]. The de facto standard is to strip them with
> --strip-debug, because this what dh_strip does[1].
> Can we make stripping static libraries a Policy “should”?
> [0] The only reference
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
As far as I can tell, the Policy currently doesn't require stripping
static libraries[0]. The de facto standard is to strip them with
--strip-debug, because this what dh_strip does[1].
Can we make stripping static libraries a Policy “should”?
[0] Th
13 matches
Mail list logo
