On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:58:19PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > Yes, but if I amend the proposal like this, then it needs to be seconded
> > > all over again, doesn't it?
[...]
> Well, they don't invalidate it, but they change it from the one that the
> seconders seconded. How do I know their se
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 11:58:56PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > Yes, but if I amend the proposal like this, then it needs to be seconded
> > all over again, doesn't it?
>
> I don't see why. You need two seconds to go from "proposal" to
> "amendment". To go from "amendment" to "accepted", y
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 04:53:12PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Yes, but if I amend the proposal like this, then it needs to be seconded all
> over again, doesn't it?
I don't see why. You need two seconds to go from "proposal" to
"amendment". To go from "amendment" to "accepted", you need
consen
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 05:41:44PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:22:50PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > I would prefer to let this rest until the initial amendment is in Policy,
> > since it's not very easy to get seconds and this amendment is already
> > overdue.
>
>
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:22:50PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I would prefer to let this rest until the initial amendment is in Policy,
> since it's not very easy to get seconds and this amendment is already
> overdue.
Surely it's possible to change a proposed amendment before it is
accepted? Th
retitle 66023 [AMENDMENT 06/05/2001] Treat plugins and shared libraries
differently
thanks
Four developers have seconded this proposal, so according to "3.3 Creating
an Amendment" of policy-process document, this proposal is an amendment.
I'm not sure about the date, the document says "[AMENDMEN
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 66023 [AMENDMENT 06/05/2001] Treat plugins and shared libraries
> differently
Bug#66023: [PROPOSAL] Treat plugins and shared libraries differently
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> +Shared object files (i.e. libsoname.so) that are
>
>Seth Arnold noticed (in a private mail to me) how this stuff in parenthesis
>shouldn't be there (my mistake), because the plugins can be named
>differently -- the file name makes no practical diff
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 11:36:41PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >> +to by third party executables (binaries of other packages),
> >> +should be installed in the subdirectories of the
> Richard> ^^^
>
> Richard> I would drop that "the", to make clea
>>"Richard" == Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> +to by third party executables (binaries of other packages),
>> +should be installed in the subdirectories of the
Richard>
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> +to by third party executables (binaries of other packages),
> +should be installed in the subdirectories of the
^^^
I would drop that "the", to make clear that packages can create
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:37:22PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I second this proposal, subject to the typographical and
> grammatical corrections included below.
Thanks. :)
> --- policy.sgml.prevMon Jul 10 11:01:16 2000
>
> +++ policy.sgml Mon J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
I second this proposal, subject to the typographical and
grammatical corrections included below.
manoj
--- policy.sgml.prevMon Jul 10 11:01:16 2000
+++ policy.sgml Mon Jul 10 11:41:12 2000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can any developer second policy proposals? If so, I second this one too...
(I have a package libwine that puts dynamically-loaded stuff into
/usr/lib/wine)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75
I'm sending this to the bug address so it is recorded :o)
- Forwarded message from Oliver Elphick -
Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 13:50:15 +0200
X-URL: http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
To: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-policy@lists.debian.or
15 matches
Mail list logo
