Bug#62948: PROPOSAL] /etc/profile is now in base-files

2000-05-03 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Actually, this is a factual error in policy, and as such, should not need to go through a discussion and consensus: when we unstymie the the policy process this should just be changed to reflect reality. manoj >>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: S

Bug#62948: PROPOSAL] /etc/profile is now in base-files

2000-04-25 Thread Taketoshi Sano
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:43:00PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Policy "3.9 Environment variables" says: > >Furthermore, as /etc/profile is a configuration file of the bash >package, no other package may put any environment variables or other >commands into that file. > > s/bash/base

Bug#62948: PROPOSAL] /etc/profile is now in base-files

2000-04-24 Thread Josip Rodin
On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 01:43:00PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > Policy "3.9 Environment variables" says: > >Furthermore, as /etc/profile is a configuration file of the bash >package, no other package may put any environment variables or other >commands into that file. > > s/bash/base

Bug#62948: PROPOSAL] /etc/profile is now in base-files

2000-04-24 Thread Steve Greenland
On 24-Apr-00, 06:43 (CDT), Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Policy "3.9 Environment variables" says: > > [...] > >Furthermore, as /etc/profile is a configuration file of the bash >package, no other package may put any environment variables or other >commands into that file.

Bug#62948: [PROPOSAL] /etc/profile is now in base-files

2000-04-24 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: debian-policy Version: potato Severity: wishlist Policy "3.9 Environment variables" says: [...] Furthermore, as /etc/profile is a configuration file of the bash package, no other package may put any environment variables or other commands into that file. s/bash/base-files/ Ma