(switching topics; sorry for the cognitive dissonance)
Steve Langasek wrote:
> Taken in sum, there is a cost to that documentation.
Thanks for a nice summary.
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 06:26:27PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Bug#593177 brings the possibility of change. In the extreme cas
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> this
> is about preinst only, which basically means (based on a quick search)
> pseudo-essential packages and debconf.
Hmm, and python-ure.
Maybe we should treat all dependencies of a pre-dependency as
pre-dep
Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 07:27:44PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Except *new* dependencies of an upgraded pre-depedency may not be
present. This is part of the philosophy behind pseudo-essential
packages generally using pre-depends for one release when they
Jonathan Nieder writes:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 07:27:44PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> Except *new* dependencies of an upgraded pre-depedency may not be
>>> present. This is part of the philosophy behind pseudo-essential
>>> packages generally using pre-depends f
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 07:27:44PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Except *new* dependencies of an upgraded pre-depedency may not be
>> present. This is part of the philosophy behind pseudo-essential
>> packages generally using p
5 matches
Mail list logo
