> On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 12:01:44AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > There needs to be a canonical list of the packages that are part of the
> > build-essential set *somewhere*.
>
> Why?
Ok, I've gone back and re-read the policy section carefully, and thought about
this quite a bit. Fundamental
On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 12:01:44AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> There needs to be a canonical list of the packages that are part of the
> build-essential set *somewhere*.
Why?
The point of the current way is to reduce the risk of having an outdated
authoritative list of build-essential packages
2 matches
Mail list logo
