Bug#509732: closed by Don Armstrong (Re: Bug#509732: Kalle's message #68)

2008-12-28 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008, José Luis González wrote: > The bug is about the Manual, not the policy package. The > debian-policy package wouldn't "[make] unrelated software on the > system (or the whole system) break," only the Manual. If the > erroneous Manual was not yet in the package that severity wou

Bug#509732: closed by Don Armstrong (Re: Bug#509732: Kalle's message #68)

2008-12-28 Thread José Luis González
> From: Don Armstrong > To: 509732-d...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#509732: Kalle's message #68 > Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:53:34 -0800 > User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) > > On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, José Luis González wrote: > > And can another developer fi

Bug#509732: Kalle's message #68

2008-12-27 Thread José Luis González
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:57:25 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, José Luis González wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:11:03 -0800 > > Don Armstrong wrote: > > > It should be filed against debian-policy with the appropriate > > > severity. > > > > What is the appropriate severity?

Bug#509732: Kalle's message #68

2008-12-27 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 27 Dec 2008, José Luis González wrote: > On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:11:03 -0800 > Don Armstrong wrote: > > It should be filed against debian-policy with the appropriate > > severity. > > What is the appropriate severity? Depends on the bug. I can't think of a non-packaging mistake in debian-

Bug#509732: Kalle's message #68

2008-12-27 Thread José Luis González
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 20:11:03 -0800 Don Armstrong wrote: > On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, José Luis González wrote: > > If you still don't understand, imagine that a text is mistakenly > > introduced in the Policy and it causes a RC bug. How should this bug > > about the Policy be reported? According to the

Bug#509732: Kalle's message #68

2008-12-26 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008, José Luis González wrote: > If you still don't understand, imagine that a text is mistakenly > introduced in the Policy and it causes a RC bug. How should this bug > about the Policy be reported? According to the Policy Manual: It should be filed against debian-policy with the

Bug#509732: Kalle's message #68

2008-12-26 Thread José Luis González
On Fri, 26 Dec 2008 12:05:15 +0200 Kalle wrote: > I think what José is reporting is that in his opinion the BTS (and > actually all pseudopackages available in the BTS) should be considered > a part of the release and there should be Policy instructions as to > how the BTS should work Only with r