Le Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:22:51AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
>
> First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
> describe in debian/README.source. For example, the use of one of the
> "standard" patch systems (quilt, dpatch, simple-patchsys) doesn't need
> to be documented
On 19/08/08 at 17:19 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:17:44PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > >
> > > >> First, section 4.14 should list t
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 03:17:44PM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > >> First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
> > >> describe in debian/READ
On 15/08/08 at 16:35 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>> I think the better way is do it similar to copyright: for common
> >>> patch/build system we s
On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> >> First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
> >> describe in debian/README.source. For example, the use of one of the
> >> "standard" patch systems
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 15/08/08 at 11:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> I think the better way is do it similar to copyright: for common
>>> patch/build system we should include only a link to the relative
>>> document. May
Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
>> describe in debian/README.source. For example, the use of one of the
>> "standard" patch systems (quilt, dpatch, simple-patchsys) doesn't need
>> to be docum
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
> describe in debian/README.source. For example, the use of one of the
> "standard" patch systems (quilt, dpatch, simple-patchsys) doesn't need
> to be documented, since every NMUer should be able to work with
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.8.0.1
Hi,
I really like the idea of documenting special things about a source
package in debian/README.source. However, I think that section 4.14
could be improved a lot.
First, section 4.14 should list things that one does not need to
describe in debian/README.
9 matches
Mail list logo
