Russ Allbery writes:
> Good point. Here's a new patch. (This doesn't apply to trap because I
> don't think trap can work without having it implemented as a shell
> built-in.)
I've now merged this change for the next release.
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 6c770fd..d694fd2 10
On Thursday 15 July 2010 11:53:03 Russ Allbery wrote:
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 6c770fd..d694fd2 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -7460,7 +7460,19 @@ fname () {
>
> must be supported and must set the value of c to
> delta.
> -
On 07/15/2010 06:53 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes:
As we have in "test" item, I think we should add ",if implemented as a
shell built-in," also for the kill command.
Good point. Here's a new patch. (This doesn't apply to trap because I
don't think trap can work with
"Giacomo A. Catenazzi" writes:
> On 05.07.2010 01:02, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> On Sunday 04 July 2010 00:04:20 Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> Yeah, I was trying too hard to avoid a problem which doesn't really
>>> exist. Here's an updated patch.
>>> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
>>> index b
On 05.07.2010 01:02, Raphael Geissert wrote:
On Sunday 04 July 2010 00:04:20 Russ Allbery wrote:
Yeah, I was trying too hard to avoid a problem which doesn't really
exist. Here's an updated patch.
diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index bad28af..8b715d0 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/poli
On Sunday 04 July 2010 00:04:20 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Yeah, I was trying too hard to avoid a problem which doesn't really
> exist. Here's an updated patch.
>
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index bad28af..8b715d0 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -7427,7 +7427,18 @@ f
Raphael Geissert writes:
>> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
>> index bad28af..1658cbf 100644
>> --- a/policy.sgml
>> +++ b/policy.sgml
>> @@ -7427,7 +7427,19 @@ fname () {
>>
>>must be supported and must set the value of c to
>>delta.
>> -
>> +
Hi Russ,
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:49:40 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here's a patch which implements that, plus an additional exception for
> libtool scripts which trap SIGPIPE by number. Objections or seconds?
> I'm copying Clint as posh maintainer since this will be relevant to which
> features pos
Raphael Geissert writes:
> Based on the results from the last archive-wide checkbashisms check on i386,
> the situation is as follows:
> There are about *91* unique binary packages with at least one match for
> the trap with signal numbers check.
> And about *112* unique binary packages with a
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.7.3.0
Severity: minor
Quoting a portion of the current section 10.4:
> Scripts may assume that /bin/sh implements the SUSv3 Shell Command
> Language[62] plus the following additional features not mandated by
> SUSv3:[63]
Based on the results from the last archive
10 matches
Mail list logo
