reopen 461440
thanks
On 2008-01-18 22:21 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> The reason for the Policy requirement is the copyright file, so I don't
>> think this can be relaxed without running the risk of getting the legal
>> material for the package wrong.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008, Russ Allbery wrote:
> The reason for the Policy requirement is the copyright file, so I don't
> think this can be relaxed without running the risk of getting the legal
> material for the package wrong. Suppose, for instance, that someone had
> an old version of one package in
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd rather have this relaxed in policy; would it be possible to drop
> the strict versionning requirements for symlinks?
The reason for the Policy requirement is the copyright file, so I don't
think this can be relaxed without running the risk of gettin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 461440 -1
Bug#461440: libgtk2.0-0: Must not use a symlink for /usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0
Bug 461440 cloned as bug 461443.
> reassign -1 debian-policy 3.7.3.0
Bug#461443: libgtk2.0-0: Must not use a symlink for /usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0
clone 461440 -1
reassign -1 debian-policy 3.7.3.0
stop
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
> In this version, libgtk2.0-0 no longer has a versioned dependency on
> libgtk2.0-common. That means that you must not symlink
> /usr/share/doc/libgtk2.0-0 to libgtk2.0-common, see policy section 12.
5 matches
Mail list logo
