On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Joey Hess wrote:
> I think someone needs to write a policy diff. It can use how
> debhelper does things as the reccomended method, without metioning
> debhelper.
The days go by, we want to freeze potato soon, but no policy change is
visible. But we should hurry up, because
Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 08:24:55AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > > As for the technical implementation of the tech-ctte decision, I propose
> > > we use joeyh's implementation found in any recently uploaded debhelper
> > > package.
> >
> > Please clarify this. Pr
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 08:24:55AM +0300, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> > As for the technical implementation of the tech-ctte decision, I propose
> > we use joeyh's implementation found in any recently uploaded debhelper
> > package.
>
> Please clarify this. Preferably give the diff you want t
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 07:38:23PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> I think someone needs to write a policy diff. It can use how debhelper does
> things as the reccomended method, without metioning debhelper. For example:
I second this proposal assuming it is amended with this or equivalent diff.
--
%%
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Joseph Carter wrote:
> The technical committee has been asked to resolve the issue of what
> to do with /usr/share/doc. I propose we actually adopt their
> decision.
I second this.
> I propose further that we don't bother to have discussion--we're
> past all that.
And I se
Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > The technical committee has been asked to resolve the issue of what to do
> > with /usr/share/doc. I propose we actually adopt their decision. I
> > propose further that we don't bother to have discussion--we're past all
> > that. The decision has been made and while pos
> Lintian is already ready to do rudimentary checks based on the debhelper
> implementation.
>
> On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 01:16:18AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > The technical committee has been asked to resolve the issue of what to do
> > > with /usr/share/doc. I propose we actually adopt th
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999 at 02:30:52AM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> As for the technical implementation of the tech-ctte decision, I propose
> we use joeyh's implementation found in any recently uploaded debhelper
> package.
Please clarify this. Preferably give the diff you want to be applied
to the
Lintian is already ready to do rudimentary checks based on the debhelper
implementation.
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 01:16:18AM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > The technical committee has been asked to resolve the issue of what to do
> > with /usr/share/doc. I propose we actually adopt their decision
> The technical committee has been asked to resolve the issue of what to do
> with /usr/share/doc. I propose we actually adopt their decision. I
> propose further that we don't bother to have discussion--we're past all
> that. The decision has been made and while possibly not the best one,
> it'
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.0.1
Severity: wishlist
The technical committee has been asked to resolve the issue of what to do
with /usr/share/doc. I propose we actually adopt their decision. I
propose further that we don't bother to have discussion--we're past all
that. The decision has be
11 matches
Mail list logo
