Processed: Re: Bug#45318: [PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

1999-10-07 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
! > close 45318 Bug#45318: [PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition Bug closed, ack sent to submitter - they'd better know why ! > reopen 45318 Bug#45318: [PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition Bug reopened, originator not changed. > retitle 45318 [ACCEPTED 07/10/1999] Amend contrib defini

Bug#45318: PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

1999-10-07 Thread Anthony Towns
retitle 45319 [DUPLICATE] Amend contrib definition close 45319 close 45318 reopen 45318 retitle 45318 [ACCEPTED 07/10/1999] Amend contrib definition severity 45318 normal thanks This proposal was seconded by Chris Lawrence, Ray Dassen, Josip Rodin, Edward Betts, Marcus Brinkmann, and Joseph Carte

Bug#45318: PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

1999-09-23 Thread Josip Rodin
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 06:15:49PM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > > > > That is, that the only consideration about whether a package should be > > > > > added to main, contrib or non-free be its licensing terms. > > > > > > > > > > Packages that are `too buggy to support' or `fail to meet policy >

Re: Bug#45318: PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

1999-09-23 Thread Anand Kumria
On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:14:44AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote: > > > > That is, that the only consideration about whether a package should be > > > > added to main, contrib or non-free be its licensing terms. > > > > > > > > Packages that are `too bu

Bug#45318: PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

1999-09-17 Thread Josip Rodin
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:14:44AM +0200, J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote: > > > That is, that the only consideration about whether a package should be > > > added to main, contrib or non-free be its licensing terms. > > > > > > Packages that are `too buggy to support' or `fail to meet policy > > > requi

Bug#45318: PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

1999-09-17 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 01:41:20 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: > On Sep 17, Anthony Towns wrote: > > That is, that the only consideration about whether a package should be > > added to main, contrib or non-free be its licensing terms. > > > > Packages that are `too buggy to support' or `fail to mee

Processed: Re: Bug#45318: [PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

1999-09-17 Thread Darren Benham
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 45318 [PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition Bug#45318: [PROPOSAL] Ammend contrib definition Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Bug#45318: PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition

1999-09-17 Thread Chris Lawrence
retitle 45318 [PROPOSAL] Amend contrib definition thanks [Retitle to correct typo] On Sep 17, Anthony Towns wrote: > That is, that the only consideration about whether a package should be > added to main, contrib or non-free be its licensing terms. > > Packages that are `too buggy to support' or