On Tue, Oct 26, 1999 at 09:38:35PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> > > + However, because '/usr/local' and its contents are for
> > > + exclusive use of the local administrator, a package must
> > > + not rely on the presence or absence of files of
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[SNIP my (last) wording]
Julian> I'm not sure how this fits in cleanly with the existing
Julian> wording. Can I suggest the following instead:
[SNIPPED Julian's patch for policy]
> Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > + However, because '/usr/local' and its contents are for
> > + exclusive use of the local administrator, a package must
> > + not rely on the presence or absence of files of
>
Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> + However, because '/usr/local' and its contents are for
> + exclusive use of the local administrator, a package must
> + not rely on the presence or absence of files of
^
> +
Proposed addition to 3.1.2:
>Because '/usr/local' and its contents are for exclusive use of the
>local administrator, a package must not rely on the presence or
>absence of files or directories in '/usr/local' for normal
>operation, although files present in there may modify or enha
5 matches
Mail list logo
