On 12-Sep-99, 20:05 (CDT), "Juergen A. Erhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Though I'd rather have it read like
>
>Because '/usr/local' and its contents are for exclusive use of the
>local administrator, a package must not rely on the presence or
>absence of files or directories in '/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Steve" == Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steve> On 12-Sep-99, 11:01 (CDT), "Juergen A. Erhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Package: debian-policy
>> Version: 3.0.1.1
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Add to sec
On 12-Sep-99, 11:01 (CDT), "Juergen A. Erhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: debian-policy
> Version: 3.0.1.1
> Severity: normal
>
> Add to section 3.1.2:
>
> /usr/local is local admin territory. Whatever the local admin
> does in or below /usr/local, must not affect the operation o
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 06:01:05PM +0200, Juergen A. Erhard wrote:
> /usr/local is local admin territory. Whatever the local admin
> does in or below /usr/local, must not affect the operation of even
> parts of a package.
So, for example, my Hugs package is in violation of this proposed
ame
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.0.1.1
Severity: normal
Add to section 3.1.2:
/usr/local is local admin territory. Whatever the local admin
does in or below /usr/local, must not affect the operation of even
parts of a package.
Thus, no package may depend on the existence of anything
5 matches
Mail list logo